da MrSoul il ven feb 28, 2020 9:56 am
Non per contraddirti Salt, però mi sa che questa sia una delle classiche nozioni che si perpetua anche tra gli addetti ai lavori, ma che non ha base regolamentare.
Io non trovo nessuna menzione, nel protocollo, all'obbligatorietà della OFR, e vale anche per i casi non oggettivi.
Incollo l'intera parte dedicata alla procedura di review, grassettando e/o sottolineando i passaggi chiave:
Review
The referee can initiate a ‘review’ for a potential ‘clear and obvious error’ or
‘serious missed incident’ when:
• the VAR (or another match official) recommends a ‘review’
• the referee suspects that something serious has been ‘missed’
If play has already stopped, the referee delays the restart
If play has not already stopped, the referee stops play when the ball is next in
a neutral zone/situation (usually when neither team is in an attacking move)
In both situations, the referee must indicate that a ‘review’ will take place by
clearly showing the ‘TV signal’ (outline of a TV screen)
The VAR describes to the referee what can be seen on the TV replay(s) but
not the decision to be taken, and the referee then:
• makes a final decision based on the referee’s own perception and the
information from the VAR, and, where appropriate, input from other match
officials – VAR-only review
or
• goes to the referee review area to view replay footage – ‘on-field review’
(OFR) – before making a final decision. The other match officials will not
review the footage unless, in exceptional circumstances, asked to do so by
the referee.
At the end of both review processes, the referee must show the ‘TV signal’
again, immediately followed by the final decision
• For factual decisions e.g. position of an offence or player (offside), point of
contact (handball/foul), location (inside or outside the penalty area), ball out
of play etc. a VAR-only review is usually appropriate but an ‘on-field review’
(OFR) can be used for a factual decision if it will help manage the players/
match or ‘sell’ the decision (e.g. a crucial match-deciding decision late in the
game)
• For subjective decisions, e.g. intensity of a foul challenge, interference at
offside, handball considerations (position, intent etc.) an ‘on-field review’
(OFR) is often appropriate
[il resto lo tralascio, non rileva]
L'OFR è quindi indicata come "spesso appropriata": suggerita, caldeggiata, ma non c'è nessun obbligo.
È buona pratica farla? Sì
È preferibile farla? Sì
Non farla è una violazione del protocollo, tale addirittura da prefigurare un reclamo? Assolutamente no.
Ultima modifica di
MrSoul il ven feb 28, 2020 10:32 am, modificato 3 volte in totale.